Tex.
Code of Crim. Proc. Article 38.07
Testimony in Corroboration of Victim of Sexual Offense
(a)
A conviction under Chapter 21 (Sexual Offenses), Section 20A.02 (Trafficking of Persons)(a)(3), (4), (7), or (8), Section 22.011 (Sexual Assault), or Section 22.021 (Aggravated Sexual Assault), Penal Code, is supportable on the uncorroborated testimony of the victim of the sexual offense if the victim informed any person, other than the defendant, of the alleged offense within one year after the date on which the offense is alleged to have occurred.(b)
The requirement that the victim inform another person of an alleged offense does not apply if at the time of the alleged offense the victim was a person:(1)
17 years of age or younger;(2)
65 years of age or older; or(3)
18 years of age or older who by reason of age or physical or mental disease, defect, or injury was substantially unable to satisfy the person’s need for food, shelter, medical care, or protection from harm.(1)
Section 19.02 (Murder) (Murder);(2)
Section 19.03 (Capital Murder) (Capital Murder);(3)
Section 19.04 (Manslaughter) (Manslaughter);(4)
Section 20.04 (Aggravated Kidnapping) (Aggravated Kidnapping);(5)
Section 21.11 (Indecency with a Child) (Indecency with a Child);(6)
Section 22.011 (Sexual Assault) (Sexual Assault);(7)
Section 22.02 (Aggravated Assault) (Aggravated Assault);(8)
Section 22.021 (Aggravated Sexual Assault) (Aggravated Sexual Assault);(9)
Section 22.04 (Injury to a Child, Elderly Individual, or Disabled Individual)(e) (Injury to a Child, Elderly Individual, or Disabled Individual);(10)
Section 22.04 (Injury to a Child, Elderly Individual, or Disabled Individual)(f) (Injury to a Child, Elderly Individual, or Disabled Individual), if the conduct is committed intentionally or knowingly;(11)
Section 25.02 (Prohibited Sexual Conduct) (Prohibited Sexual Conduct);(12)
Section 29.03 (Aggravated Robbery) (Aggravated Robbery);(13)
Section 43.25 (Sexual Performance by a Child) (Sexual Performance by a Child);(14)
Section 21.02 (Continuous Sexual Abuse of Young Child or Disabled Individual) (Continuous Sexual Abuse of Young Child or Disabled Individual);(15)
Section 43.05 (Compelling Prostitution)(a)(2) (Compelling Prostitution); or(16)
Section 20A.02 (Trafficking of Persons)(a)(7) or (8) (Trafficking of Persons).(b)
If a recording is made under Subsection (a) of this section and after an indictment is returned or a complaint has been filed, by motion of the attorney representing the state or the attorney representing the defendant and on the approval of the court, both attorneys may propound written interrogatories that shall be presented by the same neutral individual who made the initial inquiries, if possible, and recorded under the same or similar circumstances of the original recording with the time and date of the inquiry clearly indicated in the recording.(c)
A recording made under Subsection (a) of this section is not admissible into evidence unless a recording made under Subsection (b) is admitted at the same time if a recording under Subsection (b) was requested prior to the time of the hearing or proceeding.(b)
The court may set any other conditions and limitations on the taking of the testimony that it finds just and appropriate, taking into consideration the interests of the child, the rights of the defendant, and any other relevant factors.(b)
The court may set any other conditions and limitations on the taking of the testimony that it finds just and appropriate, taking into consideration the interests of the child, the rights of the defendant, and any other relevant factors. The court shall also ensure that:(1)
the recording is both visual and aural and is recorded on film or videotape or by other electronic means;(2)
the recording equipment was capable of making an accurate recording, the operator was competent, the quality of the recording is sufficient to allow the court and the finder of fact to assess the demeanor of the child and the interviewer, and the recording is accurate and is not altered;(3)
each voice on the recording is identified;(4)
the defendant, the attorneys for each party, and the expert witnesses for each party are afforded an opportunity to view the recording before it is shown in the courtroom;(5)
before giving his testimony, the child was placed under oath or was otherwise admonished in a manner appropriate to the child’s age and maturity to testify truthfully;(6)
the court finds from the recording or through an in camera examination of the child that the child was competent to testify at the time the recording was made; and(7)
only one continuous recording of the child was made or the necessity for pauses in the recordings or for multiple recordings is established at the hearing or proceeding.(c)
After a complaint has been filed or an indictment returned charging the defendant, on the motion of the attorney representing the state, the court may order that the deposition of the child be taken outside of the courtroom in the same manner as a deposition may be taken in a civil matter. A deposition taken under this subsection is admissible into evidence.(1)
no attorney or peace officer was present when the statement was made;(2)
the recording is both visual and aural and is recorded on film or videotape or by other electronic means;(3)
the recording equipment was capable of making an accurate recording, the operator of the equipment was competent, the quality of the recording is sufficient to allow the court and the finder of fact to assess the demeanor of the child and the interviewer, and the recording is accurate and has not been altered;(4)
the statement was not made in response to questioning calculated to lead the child to make a particular statement;(5)
every voice on the recording is identified;(6)
the person conducting the interview of the child in the recording is expert in the handling, treatment, and investigation of child abuse cases, present at the hearing or proceeding, called by the state, and subject to cross-examination;(7)
immediately after a complaint was filed or an indictment returned, the attorney representing the state notified the court, the defendant, and the attorney representing the defendant of the existence of the recording;(8)
the defendant, the attorney for the defendant, and the expert witnesses for the defendant were afforded an opportunity to view the recording before it is offered into evidence and, if a proceeding was requested as provided by Subsection (b) of this section, in a proceeding conducted before a district court judge but outside the presence of the jury were afforded an opportunity to cross-examine the child as provided by Subsection (b) of this section from any time immediately following the filing of the complaint or the returning of an indictment charging the defendant until the date the hearing or proceeding begins;(9)
the recording of the cross-examination, if there is one, is admissible under Subsection (b) of this section;(10)
before giving his testimony, the child was placed under oath or was otherwise admonished in a manner appropriate to the child’s age and maturity to testify truthfully;(11)
the court finds from the recording or through an in camera examination of the child that the child was competent to testify at the time that the recording was made; and(12)
only one continuous recording of the child was made or the necessity for pauses in the recordings or for multiple recordings has been established at the hearing or proceeding.(b)
On the motion of the attorney representing the defendant, a district court may order that the cross-examination of the child be taken and be recorded before the judge of that court at any time until a recording made in accordance with Subsection (a) of this section has been introduced into evidence at the hearing or proceeding. On a finding by the court that the following requirements were satisfied, the recording of the cross-examination of the child is admissible into evidence and shall be viewed by the finder of fact only after the finder of fact has viewed the recording authorized by Subsection (a) of this section if:(1)
the recording is both visual and aural and is recorded on film or videotape or by other electronic means;(2)
the recording equipment was capable of making an accurate recording, the operator of the equipment was competent, the quality of the recording is sufficient to allow the court and the finder of fact to assess the demeanor of the child and the attorney representing the defendant, and the recording is accurate and has not been altered;(3)
every voice on the recording is identified;(4)
the defendant, the attorney representing the defendant, the attorney representing the state, and the expert witnesses for the defendant and the state were afforded an opportunity to view the recording before the hearing or proceeding began;(5)
the child was placed under oath before the cross-examination began or was otherwise admonished in a manner appropriate to the child’s age and maturity to testify truthfully; and(6)
only one continuous recording of the child was made or the necessity for pauses in the recordings or for multiple recordings was established at the hearing or proceeding.(c)
During cross-examination under Subsection (b) of this section, to the extent practicable, only a district court judge, the attorney representing the defendant, the attorney representing the state, persons necessary to operate the equipment, and any other person whose presence would contribute to the welfare and well-being of the child may be present in the room with the child during his testimony. Only the attorneys and the judge may question the child. To the extent practicable, the persons operating the equipment shall be confined to an adjacent room or behind a screen or mirror that permits them to see and hear the child during his testimony but does not permit the child to see or hear them. The court shall permit the defendant to observe and hear the testimony of the child and to communicate contemporaneously with his attorney during periods of recess or by audio contact, but shall attempt to ensure that the child cannot hear or see the defendant.(d)
Under Subsection (b) of this section the district court may set any other conditions and limitations on the taking of the cross-examination of a child that it finds just and appropriate, taking into consideration the interests of the child, the rights of the defendant, and any other relevant factors.(1)
of emotional or physical causes, including the confrontation with the defendant; or(2)
the child would suffer undue psychological or physical harm through his involvement at the hearing or proceeding.(b)
A determination of unavailability under this article can be made after an earlier determination of availability. A determination of availability under this article can be made after an earlier determination of unavailability.
Source:
Article 38.07 — Testimony in Corroboration of Victim of Sexual Offense, https://statutes.capitol.texas.gov/Docs/CR/htm/CR.38.htm#38.07 (accessed Jun. 5, 2024).
