Public.Law logo Texas.Public.Law
  • Texas Statutes
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Statutes
  3. Code of Crim. Proc.
  4. Title 1
  5. Chap. 35

Chapter 35
Formation of the Jury

Articles

35.01
Jurors Called
35.02
Sworn to Answer Questions
35.04
Claiming Exemption
35.05
Excused by Consent
35.06
Challenge to Array First Heard
35.07
Challenge to the Array
35.08
When Challenge Is Sustained
35.09
List of New Venire
35.10
Court to Try Qualifications
35.11
Preparation of List
35.12
Mode of Testing
35.13
Passing Juror for Challenge
35.14
A Peremptory Challenge
35.15
Number of Challenges
35.16
Reasons for Challenge for Cause
35.17
Voir Dire Examination
35.18
Other Evidence on Challenge
35.19
Absolute Disqualification
35.20
Names Called in Order
35.21
Judge to Decide Qualifications
35.22
Oath to Jury
35.23
Jurors May Separate
35.25
Making Peremptory Challenge
35.26
Lists Returned to Clerk
35.27
Reimbursement of Nonresident Witnesses
35.28
When No Clerk
35.29
Personal Information About Jurors
35.261
Peremptory Challenges Based on Race Prohibited
 



Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The State Bar of Texas runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Lawyer Referral & Information Service (LRIS)

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location: https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._code_of_crim._proc._title_1_chapter_35

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Trust but verify.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.