Public.Law logo Texas.Public.Law
  • Texas Statutes
  • Remove ads
  • Login
  1. Home
  2. Statutes
  3. Agric. Code
  4. Title 7
  5. Chap. 203

Chapter 203
Water Supply Enhancement

Sections

203.001
Definitions
203.002
Purpose of Program
203.011
Authority of Board
203.012
Rules
203.013
Authority of Districts
203.014
Personnel
203.015
Expenditures
203.016
Consultation
203.051
State Plan
203.052
Notice and Hearing
203.053
Criteria for Accepting and Prioritizing Water Supply Enhancement Projects
203.054
Amending Plan
203.055
Approved Methods for Brush Control
203.056
Report
203.057
Feasibility Studies
203.101
General Authority
203.102
Provide Information Relating to Program
203.103
Acceptance and Comment on Application
203.104
Supervision of Cost-sharing Contracts
203.151
Creation of Cost-sharing Program
203.154
Limit on Cost-sharing Participation
203.156
Application for Cost Sharing
203.157
Considerations in Passing on Application
203.158
Approval of Application
203.160
Contract for Cost Sharing
203.161
Administration of Expenditures
203.162
Water Supply Enhancement Plans
 



Stay Connected

Join thousands of people who receive monthly site updates.

Subscribe

Instagram Facebook Twitter Our GitHub Page

Get Legal Help

The State Bar of Texas runs a service for finding an attorney in good standing. Initial consultations are usually free or discounted: Lawyer Referral & Information Service (LRIS)

Committed to Public Service

We will always provide free access to the current law. In addition, we provide special support for non-profit, educational, and government users. Through social entre­pre­neurship, we’re lowering the cost of legal services and increasing citizen access.

Navigate

  • Find a Lawyer
  • Blog
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Reports
  • Secondary Sources
California: Codes
Colorado: C.R.S.
Nevada: NRS
New York: Laws
Oregon: OAR, ORS
Texas: Statutes
World: Rome Statute, International Dictionary

Location: https://texas.public.law/statutes/tex._agric._code_title_7_chapter_203

Blank Outline Levels

The legislature occasionally skips outline levels. For example:

(3) A person may apply [...]
(4)(a) A person petitioning for relief [...]

In this example, (3), (4), and (4)(a) are all outline levels, but (4) was omitted by its authors. It's only implied. This presents an interesting challenge when laying out the text. We've decided to display a blank section with this note, in order to aide readability.

Trust but verify.

Do you have an opinion about this solution? Drop us a line.